Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¾Æ ºÎÀ§¿¡ µû¸¥ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ

Fracture strength of zirconia ceramic crowns according to tooth position

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 48±Ç 2È£ p.94 ~ 100
ÀÌÀμ·, µ¿Áø±Ù, ±èÁ¤¹Ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀμ· ( Lee In-Seop ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
µ¿Áø±Ù ( Dong Jin-Keun ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÁ¤¹Ì ( Kim Jeong-Mi ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº´¿ø

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â »ó¾Ç°ú ÇϾÇÀÇ °¢ Ä¡¾ÆºÎÀ§¿¡ LavaTM All-Ceramic SystemÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ÀüºÎµµÀç°üÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ°í °¢°¢ÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý:ÁßÀýÄ¡¿Í °ßÄ¡´Â Àý´Ü¿¬ÀÇ »èÁ¦·®À» 2.0 mm, ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¿Í ´ë±¸Ä¡´Â ±³ÇÕ¸éÀÇ »èÁ¦·®À» 1.5 mm, ±×¸®°í Ãà¸é °æ»çµµ´Â 8??·ÎÇÏ¿©¸ðµÎ8±ºÀÇ ½ÇÇ豺À» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Ý¼Ó ´ÙÀÌ¿Í Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÈÄ ·¹Áø½Ã¸àÆ® (Rely XTM Unicem)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇÕÂøÇÏ°í ¸¸´É½ÃÇè±â»ó¿¡¼­ Ä¡¾Æ ÀåÃà¿¡ 30??°æ»çÁö°Ô ÇÏ¿© ÁßÀýÄ¡¿Í °ßÄ¡¿¡ Á¦ÀÛµÈ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀº Àý´Ü¿¬ Áß¾Ó ºÎÀ§¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¿Í ´ë±¸Ä¡¿¡ Á¦ÀÛµÈ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀº ±â´É±³µÎÀÇ Çù¼³Ãø °æ»ç¸é Áß¾ÓºÎÀ§¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀÌ °¡ÇØÁöµµ·ÏÇÑ ÈÄ ÆÄÀý°­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú:1. Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀÇ Æò±Õ ÆÄÀý°­µµ´Â ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿¡¼­ 2963 NÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ÇÏ¾Ç ÁßÀýÄ¡¿¡¼­ 1035 NÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°ü°ú IPS Empress µµÀç°ü°úÀÇ Æò±Õ ÆÄÀý°­µµ´Â ¸ðµç Ä¡¾Æ¿¡¼­ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀÌ ´õ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀÇ ÆÄÀý ¾ç»óÀº ÇÏÁßÀÌ °¡ÇØÁø Áß¾Ó ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ Ä¡¾Æ ÀåÃàÀ¸·Î ¼öÁ÷ÀûÀÎ ÆÄÀý»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 4. »ó¾Ç°ú ÇϾÇÀÇ µ¿ÀÏ ºÎÀ§¿¡ Á¦ÀÛµÈ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ´Â ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¿¡¼­ »ó¾ÇÀÌ ÇϾǿ¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ³·Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç (P< .05), ´Ù¸¥ ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù (P> .05).

°á·Ð: º» ½ÇÇèÀÇ °á°ú·Î Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°üÀº ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼­ È°¿ëÇϱ⿡ ¸¸Á·ÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ °­µµ¸¦ °®°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. (´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2010;48:94-100)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of the zirconia ceramic crowns according to tooth position.

Material and methods: After 10 metal dies were made for each group, the zirconia ceramic crowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM system (Lava¢â All-Ceramic System) and each crown was cemented on each metal die with resin cement (Rely X¢â Unicem). The cemented zirconia ceramic crowns mounted on the testing jig were inclined with 30 degrees to the long axis of the tooth and the universal testing machine was used to measure the fracture strength.

Results: 1. The fracture strength of the zirconia ceramic crown in the lower 1st molar (2963 N) had the highest and that in the lower central incisor (1035 N) had the lowest. 2. The fracture strength of zirconia ceramic crown was higher than that of the IPS Empress crowns in all tooth position. 3. The fracture mode of the crowns was similar. Most of fracture lines began at the loading area and extended through proximal surface perpendicular to the long axis of the crowns. 4. There were no significant differences on the fracture strength of the zirconia ceramic crowns according to tooth position except in premolar group.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggested that strength of zirconia ceramic crown is satisfactory for clinical use.

Å°¿öµå

Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ µµÀç°ü;ÆÄÀý°­µµ
Zirconia ceramic crown;Fracture strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed